<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Separate Trains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/</link>
	<description>—299 words. Anything more is waste.—</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:22:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grantman</title>
		<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/#comment-8611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grantman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-8611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[..can relate this one Dave, but only metaphorically..when married for a long time people often find themselves on the same train and going in the same direction, but the stops represent destinations both shared and unshared..and like the dilemma this couple faces, choosing the destination is never  really a problem...leaving together is! Nice ..I like it.
grantman

&lt;strong&gt;That&#039;s very clever, grantman. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to find a similar meditation back at your own blog, where I and everyone else will now go looking. Smart stuff.
--David&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..can relate this one Dave, but only metaphorically..when married for a long time people often find themselves on the same train and going in the same direction, but the stops represent destinations both shared and unshared..and like the dilemma this couple faces, choosing the destination is never  really a problem&#8230;leaving together is! Nice ..I like it.<br />
grantman</p>
<p><strong>That&#8217;s very clever, grantman. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to find a similar meditation back at your own blog, where I and everyone else will now go looking. Smart stuff.<br />
&#8211;David</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manz</title>
		<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/#comment-8575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-8575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wish I had the words to express my true reaction to this! I&#039;m sure there are many couples who can relate to the short story.

&lt;strong&gt;Hey, Manz! I know you! It&#039;s wonderful to see you here. I&#039;m glad the story, well, made you speechless I guess is what it did. That&#039;s fine. Silence from critics is not always a bad thing. Welcome to Very Short Novels!
--David&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I had the words to express my true reaction to this! I&#8217;m sure there are many couples who can relate to the short story.</p>
<p><strong>Hey, Manz! I know you! It&#8217;s wonderful to see you here. I&#8217;m glad the story, well, made you speechless I guess is what it did. That&#8217;s fine. Silence from critics is not always a bad thing. Welcome to Very Short Novels!<br />
&#8211;David</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick.</title>
		<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/#comment-8541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-8541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 299 words, Sir, that was stunning. Here i am lamenting my inability to write letters in 120 words, when there are guys writing full, intricate AND glorious novels in 299 words. You inspire me, Sir.
Consider me a new fan.

Rick.

&lt;strong&gt;Aw. I&#039;ll bet you say that to all the 299-word novelists. Thank you, Rick and welcome to Very Short Novels. You have earned the right to roundly criticize everything I do from now on.

(If you want an automatic link back, provide your URL when you comment and your name becomes the link.)
--David&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 299 words, Sir, that was stunning. Here i am lamenting my inability to write letters in 120 words, when there are guys writing full, intricate AND glorious novels in 299 words. You inspire me, Sir.<br />
Consider me a new fan.</p>
<p>Rick.</p>
<p><strong>Aw. I&#8217;ll bet you say that to all the 299-word novelists. Thank you, Rick and welcome to Very Short Novels. You have earned the right to roundly criticize everything I do from now on.</p>
<p>(If you want an automatic link back, provide your URL when you comment and your name becomes the link.)<br />
&#8211;David</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlove</title>
		<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/#comment-8524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[litlove]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-8524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds like something I lived through once. Although it wasn&#039;t quite this way - the details have changed. ;) The anguish of separation, however, tastes always the same.

&lt;strong&gt;What you say is so true, Litlove. I&#039;ve been on this train too. It&#039;s not the other we doubt, it&#039;s ourselves and what we might have done better. Wonderful to see you here again!
--David&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like something I lived through once. Although it wasn&#8217;t quite this way &#8211; the details have changed. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  The anguish of separation, however, tastes always the same.</p>
<p><strong>What you say is so true, Litlove. I&#8217;ve been on this train too. It&#8217;s not the other we doubt, it&#8217;s ourselves and what we might have done better. Wonderful to see you here again!<br />
&#8211;David</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damyantig</title>
		<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/#comment-8515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damyantig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-8515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure why I like it, but I do. But I think it is the content more than the meter, or perhaps because they are married together so well.
I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll ever make a good critic.

&lt;strong&gt;By good critic I imagine you mean a critic who broadens the work rather than narrows it, who improves the original by sharing an informed appreciation. We&#039;ve never had many of those. Thanks, damyantig.
--David&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why I like it, but I do. But I think it is the content more than the meter, or perhaps because they are married together so well.<br />
I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll ever make a good critic.</p>
<p><strong>By good critic I imagine you mean a critic who broadens the work rather than narrows it, who improves the original by sharing an informed appreciation. We&#8217;ve never had many of those. Thanks, damyantig.<br />
&#8211;David</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Querulous Squirrel</title>
		<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/#comment-8511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Querulous Squirrel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-8511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is always the dilemma of losing children while shopping in a store. Telling them to stay put, don&#039;t wander, don&#039;t talk to strangers, just wait until Mommy comes back and finds you, or make your way to the cashier for help. I tended towards the first in the short term, the second in the long term, though in child-time short and long term is different than ours. I think the rule of thumb would be stay put in the last place you were seen together for as long as you can stand it, at least an hour, otherwise in a city with a subway, you&#039;ll be hopelessly lost to each other with all the trust in the world. With children you at least know to make up such plans in advance: stay put if we&#039;re separated. Why don&#039;t grown ups think to make up such rules. And this wouldn&#039;t even be an issue if this story took place during an era of cell phones. What is this, the l950&#039;s? Or did one of them forget to charge her phone, like I always do?
&lt;strong&gt;
Thanks, Squirrel. I love your meditation on planning and kids. I&#039;ve covered that theme myself in an earlier Very Short Novel, &quot;One Step Back.&quot; http://wp.me/p1JoF-2Y As for adults, I do sometimes make contingency rules for train trips like this one. If separated, meet at the destination station. Regarding the cell phone question, you&#039;re not the first to ask. I think I&#039;ll fix it with about four words. (Look for an edited version soon.) There&#039;s no cell service in the subway, and when you&#039;re afraid to miss a train, you can&#039;t leave the station to place a call.
--David&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is always the dilemma of losing children while shopping in a store. Telling them to stay put, don&#8217;t wander, don&#8217;t talk to strangers, just wait until Mommy comes back and finds you, or make your way to the cashier for help. I tended towards the first in the short term, the second in the long term, though in child-time short and long term is different than ours. I think the rule of thumb would be stay put in the last place you were seen together for as long as you can stand it, at least an hour, otherwise in a city with a subway, you&#8217;ll be hopelessly lost to each other with all the trust in the world. With children you at least know to make up such plans in advance: stay put if we&#8217;re separated. Why don&#8217;t grown ups think to make up such rules. And this wouldn&#8217;t even be an issue if this story took place during an era of cell phones. What is this, the l950&#8242;s? Or did one of them forget to charge her phone, like I always do?<br />
<strong><br />
Thanks, Squirrel. I love your meditation on planning and kids. I&#8217;ve covered that theme myself in an earlier Very Short Novel, &#8220;One Step Back.&#8221; <a href="http://wp.me/p1JoF-2Y" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/p1JoF-2Y</a> As for adults, I do sometimes make contingency rules for train trips like this one. If separated, meet at the destination station. Regarding the cell phone question, you&#8217;re not the first to ask. I think I&#8217;ll fix it with about four words. (Look for an edited version soon.) There&#8217;s no cell service in the subway, and when you&#8217;re afraid to miss a train, you can&#8217;t leave the station to place a call.<br />
&#8211;David</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damyantig</title>
		<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/#comment-8510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damyantig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-8510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really love the last line.

&lt;strong&gt;Thanks, damyantig. It&#039;s the meter, isn&#039;t it?
--David&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love the last line.</p>
<p><strong>Thanks, damyantig. It&#8217;s the meter, isn&#8217;t it?<br />
&#8211;David</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal</title>
		<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/#comment-8506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crystal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-8506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was very fun!  I love the play on the usual dynamics of a relationship.  The title, as well, says so much.
&lt;strong&gt;
I think they&#039;ll be OK, don&#039;t you? They may have taken separate trains, but they seem to be on the same track. Thank you, Crystal, for continuing your streak of recent comments.
--David&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was very fun!  I love the play on the usual dynamics of a relationship.  The title, as well, says so much.<br />
<strong><br />
I think they&#8217;ll be OK, don&#8217;t you? They may have taken separate trains, but they seem to be on the same track. Thank you, Crystal, for continuing your streak of recent comments.<br />
&#8211;David</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hambidge</title>
		<link>http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/separate-trains/#comment-8505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Hambidge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbdale.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-8505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve read this 5 times to get a handle on the tale, the details you compact into 299 words is awesome; I stand in awe of your gift!

dave

&lt;strong&gt;Oh, good. For a moment there, I thought you were going to tell me it made no sense. Thank you, Dave. You give me incentive to do my best.
--David&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read this 5 times to get a handle on the tale, the details you compact into 299 words is awesome; I stand in awe of your gift!</p>
<p>dave</p>
<p><strong>Oh, good. For a moment there, I thought you were going to tell me it made no sense. Thank you, Dave. You give me incentive to do my best.<br />
&#8211;David</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
